Exercise Calorie Comparison Calculator

Compare calories burned across 10 exercises at your weight and duration.

By Konstantin Iakovlev · Updated September 2026 · Source: 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities (Herrmann et al., J Sport Health Sci 2024)

lbs
min

Highest Burn

HIIT: 424 cal

Calories Burned Comparison

HIIT424 cal
Jumping Rope424 cal
Running (6 mph)359 cal
Cycling (12-14 mph)308 cal
Rowing281 cal
Weightlifting231 cal
Swimming (moderate)224 cal
Elliptical193 cal
Walking (3.5 mph)185 cal
Yoga89 cal

Use the Exercise Calorie Comparison Calculator above to calculate your results. Enter your values and see instant results — all calculations run in your browser.

Disclaimer: This calculator is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Results are estimates from standard formulas and the numbers you enter. Talk to a doctor or another qualified health professional about your own health before acting on them.

How It Works

Side by side, 10 popular exercises rarely burn calories at the same rate, and the gap depends on two things you control: your body weight and how long you work out. Comparing those numbers turns vague intuition about which workout is most efficient into something you can actually measure and plan around.

Each exercise carries a Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) value, a physiological figure that expresses the energy cost of a given activity relative to sitting still. The estimate comes from multiplying your weight in kilograms by that MET value and then by your duration in hours, following the formula Calories = METs * weight (kg) * duration (hours). Because body mass sits right in the equation, heavier and lighter people get appropriately different results from the same workout.

Treat every figure here as an estimate. Real calorie burn shifts with intensity, fitness level, and the quirks of your own metabolism, so two people doing identical workouts can land in different places. Calorie expenditure also tends to get overestimated, and that gap is where overeating and frustration creep in. Lasting results lean far more on consistency, sound nutrition, and choosing activities you'll actually keep doing than on any single burn number.

Example: 45 Minutes of Cycling, Weightlifting or Jumping Rope at 160 Pounds

  1. 1 Input: body weight 160 lbs (160 × 0.4536 = 72.58 kg) and duration 45 minutes (0.75 hours). The calculator applies the same duration to all ten activities.
  2. 2 Cycling at 12-14 mph (8.0 METs): 8.0 × 72.58 × 0.75 = 435 calories. Weightlifting (6.0 METs): 6.0 × 72.58 × 0.75 = 327 calories.
  3. 3 Jumping rope (11.0 METs) comes to 11.0 × 72.58 × 0.75 = 599 calories, and the elliptical (5.0 METs) to 272.
  4. 4 All ten MET values come from the 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities (6.0 is its vigorous free-weight or machine weightlifting entry; walking is its 3.5-3.9 mph brisk pace at 4.8, running at 6 mph is 9.3 and moderate freestyle laps 5.8). Cycling burns about a third more than lifting in the same 45 minutes, though lifting builds strength that a calorie count does not show.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which exercise burns the most calories per hour?
Using the 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities, a 155-pound person burns about 845 calories an hour running at 8 mph or cycling at 16-19 mph (12.0 METs each), about 775 skipping rope (11.0 METs), and about 690 swimming fast freestyle laps (9.8 METs). Actual burn depends heavily on intensity and body weight.
Is walking as good as running for weight loss?
Walking burns fewer calories per minute but is more sustainable for many people. A 155-pound person walking briskly at 3.5 mph (4.8 METs) burns about 340 calories an hour versus about 650 running at 6 mph (9.3 METs). Walking has lower injury risk and can be done longer, making total calorie burn competitive.
How accurate are fitness tracker calorie estimates?
Not very. A 2017 Stanford study tested seven wrist-worn devices against lab measurements in 60 adults while sitting, walking, running and cycling: six of them measured heart rate with a median error below 5% during cycling, but none estimated calories burned with an error below 20%. Use tracker data for relative comparisons between workouts rather than as absolute calorie counts.